- 3do arm emulator portable#
- 3do arm emulator software#
- 3do arm emulator code#
- 3do arm emulator simulator#
that is why i didnt noticed them before and though game systems had been shorted out to portable ones only. and its quite not much visible, the spin off pages should be bolde out i think. still, i dont think all of the emulators are placed on the spinoff pages. the current one is omitting so many emulators than i cant even describe how much unpleased i am.- LPCA 06:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Īh sorry ive just noticed some links i didnt before. I think the last complete revision dated of May 2006 is more suitable and complete than the current one. I also propose using templates, so for example the list of Apple II emulators is not repeated on the "List of Apple II emulators" page. A list of of emulators according to the system it runs on should go elsewhere. does it make sense to have a "Emulators on Portable Systems" section? It would make more sense to just have a list of emulators according to the system being emulated. JWhiteheadcc ( talk) 21:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC) Recategorization
3do arm emulator code#
This provides a source of confusion for laymen to the 8051 like me who initially try to find "emulators" for debugging code only to find out that they need to look up "simulators", instead.
3do arm emulator software#
Of course that is probably because most 6502 programmers are thinking in software terms, I think. Something some guy named Turing said applies. ) Do all other microcontrollers and follow this trend? In the 6502 world, software and hardware emulation are considered to be pretty much identical - mathematically, emulation and simulation do the exact same thing. They must have been IBM programmers as well. MarsDEM 19:21, (UTC) Oddly enough, this terminology is also used for the 8051 family (Technically MSC-51) of microchips.
3do arm emulator simulator#
My NCR390 "emulator" is software driven, and I called it a simulator based on IBM's usage 4 decades ago. Both produced essentially the same (accurate) results, but one was firmware-driven while the other was software-driven. I called it a simulator based on IBM's use of the term in the 1960s where the "1401 emulator" (for an earlier mainframe) was an optional firmware component added to a System/360's microcode, enabling the user to run in 1401 mode, while the "1401 simulator" was a program written in 360/Assembler Language that simulated the operation of a 1401 computer, running in System/360 mode, as an ordinary application program. Can this program and website be listed in Wiki?Īs I said, it **IS** an emulator (see above), in the sense that it imitates the function of that computer, accepts programs written for it, and achieves the same results as the original computer. It can be found at: which is an NCR website run by Aleksandrs Guba. It used punched paper tape, punched cards, and magnetic ledgers. I have written an emulator (which I call a simulator) for the NCR390 computer, a computer in use during the 1960s. I really would like to know why this happened and when will you restore this and other omits - LPCA 06:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC) NCR 390 Simulator These links pointed to wikipedia articles i must say again and not external links I would like to know what you are doing and thinking as you removed links to Wikipedia pages about certain platforms and emulators, such as the ones for Playstation 1/2 and Xbox. Please, do not add direct HTML links on this page, rather create an article about the emulator. We would put in this page references to the other lists. Split article? Should the article be split into several different articles like say one for CPU emulators, another for computer emulators, and another for gaming systems? it seems quite messy in its current state Songjin 08:17, (UTC) 14 Separate article for comprehensive list of CPU emulators?.
0 kommentar(er)
